Trying to beat that losing argument like a dead horse, eh? Your last comment was completely unfocused (I suspect due to being shaken up by my reply - this happens in Court at lot, too - your going to have to do better if you want convince a judge / jury) We are talking about comics here, right? The main focus for any application should be does the applicant have something neat and funny to offer the hosting site. With regard to that, the masses have responded with a resounding - Yes! You should focus your objections on that question. Not on making side / irrelevant arguments like 'he's already established and making money eleswhere' So what? Should every applicant be a starving artist / pop up hater with no aspirations (or no hope because their suff sucks) of seeing his / her work generate income? I'm not going to appoligize to the likes of you because people enjoy my strip, it's succesful and it generates income! The bottom line here is if the applicant has something neat and funny to share with the community then give a thumbs up if not then give a thumbs down. In other words, if you like BLOOP then say 'Yeah, BLOOP is kinda cool' and if you don't like BLOOP say 'Eh, not my cup of tea'. Don't waste my time, the hosts time and your time with simple / illogical ramblings that are biased / envious at best and make no sense at worst. Simple as that! Fair enough?
